Saturday, November 18, 2006

Lord of War- The Arms Trade

There is a movie called Lord of War, starring Nicholas Cage. It's a good movie, I'd suggest you watch it. It follows a Ukrainian-American as he enters and then gains power in the business of selling weapons illegally. He and others like him make sure that wars run smoothly wherever wars can be fought. Smoothly in the sense that there won't be people who want to murder others going without the necessary assault rifle.

The problems with this kind of business are fairly obvious: the world doesn't actually want terrorists with AK-47s, RPGs, or whatever else they can get their hands on. This trade isn't likely to go away easily, since the US uses it to supply "freedom-fighters" when it wants to put pressure on a government it doesn't like, see Iran-Contra. Another problem is that black markets are notoriously hard to control, and this would require cooperation between governments on a global scale. Seeing how this doesn't even work with drugs, why would it work with guns? Still, a greater commitment to controlling arms would be a step in the right direction. There is a campaign calling governments, through the UN, to take greater measure to control the trade of arms called, appropriately, Control Arms, located at www.controlarms.org.

However, there is another, disturbing aspect to the arms trade, one that the Security Council would not like to admit its role in. And that is that the only reason there are weapons floating around to fall into the hand of militants is that they're produced in insanely huge quantities. After World War II the United States was faced with a dilemma. How was it going to maintain wartime levels of arms production, and protect this vital industry, without a war to fight? Well, at first it started giving away the surpluses it had to its allies. Its allies didn't really want more weaponry, though, as they wanted to produce their own.

So unable to sell to each other, America, France, Russia, and Britain started selling abroad. They sold so much that America and France are still the two largest producers of military goods and are still producing as if they were at war with someone. (Well, the US is at war with Iraq but it's not suffering from a lack of nukes or tanks, is it?) Russia produced so many of its highly effective AK-47 that it is truly the weapon of choice for militants and child soldiers worldwide. Britain has been replaced by China, since China soon realized this was a lucrative business indeed, and it had an impressive domestic market to start off with.

So thank you, Big Business. Thank you for fueling conflict around the globe, and thank you to the government for creating this monster of an industry to begin. As Matthew Good said it on Remembrance Day, "the very principles and freedoms that those individuals [i.e. soldiers] fought to protect have been either endangered or altogether lost by the sheer magnitude of our perpetual love affair with destruction." A love affair that has lined the pockets of the super-rich, created child soldiers, and aided conflict across the globe.

4 comments:

Unknown said...

Ha!
My infantile pleasure of being the first at doing something, in this case post the first comment, lives on!

Well.

You are right about the arms production. It's crazy to know that the US is producing like it's in the midst of another major conflict - I'm not saying that Iraq isn't major, I'm saying it could be worse, i.e. Iran vs. USA.

The USSR produced immense amounts of Kalashnikovs. As far as I know, more than 100.000.000 were produced. YES, that is One Hundred Million.

Though this semi-experiment may be tragically flawed, assume this:

1. Few Kalashnikovs degraded with time (after all, Mikhail Kalashnikov designed them to be as simple and rugged as possible). So, most of them could still be used.
2. Someone decided to spread them around the world's population.

So that would mean that one in about seventy people had one.
Next time you have English/Math/Or just a class attended by many people look around and try and imagine a couple of them with Shiny, Black Automated Rifles.

Scary, eh? Though it would be sweet if that person were you. Nevermind.

The USSR actually outsourced the Kalashnikov's production. This is the way in which so many were produced. Almost every country in the Eastern Block, not to even mention China, had its own version.

The Kalashnikov has to be one of the greatest weapons of all time - I actually recall watching a documentary on the Greatest Weapons of all Time, and if memory serves me right, the Kalashnikov was the fourth-ish. Damn.

The bad part is that no one nation's people can influence the making of/supply of weapons to semi-legit or ilegit organizations/people/you name it.

Just imagine how much money corporations like Halliburton or the larger player in the Defense business (I can't recall its name right now) won as a result of Iraq. Their people are bound to be so high up in the Pyramid that few things can get to them, including changing presidents.

Now: don't you think you've posted/we've spoken too much about problems the world has today?

I mean, awareness is not bad, and it sure is a lot better than "Ignorance is bliss", but I would also favor reading about more casual things once in a while.

Or at least post a joke. That would make it better. :P

I also want to tease you about being underage in Canadaland, but I will only do that when I get to talk to you, face to face.

So,

Have a good week. Don't get busted doing drugs.

Vlad,
Eternal Vampire.

Isabel Montoya V. said...

Since your friend Vlad wrote so long i will make it short and sweet.
Guns are the reason Colombia is the way it is .

Odm said...

I actually just read this post, so I wasn't exactly inspired by it to write a less-serious post.

You make a good point about Kalashnikovs, namely that even if all production of weapons were to cease, you'd still have insane amounts of weapons floating around. That's the reason the Control Arms initiative is important. However it's much harder to control the trade of arms when there are still such high levels of production. The arms trade will still be a problem no matter what countries do, but unlike drugs gun production can be controlled to a much greater extent, meaning it's possible to actually confront the issue.

Speaking of drugs, don't tell me what to do with my fucking life, man. Whoa, this is some sweet shit...

Anonymous said...

Wasn't Lord of War an awesome movie? Gotta love black comedy. Anyway, Voltaire's Bastards has this great in-depth harangue on the "flowering of armaments-" it's a fun read and amazingly relevant for something that's 15 years old. I would post a link herre, but eh, I'm lazy. Same with something I found about Kalashnikov vodka- it's to die for.

Well, it's good to know that I can immortalize bad puns in cyberspace.

Keep Publishing (Maybe do one high just to PO Vlad)
Nick